essay代写,代写assignment,paper代写,代写留学作业,英国作业

导航切换

QQ:
153688106

二维码

香港代写assignment|Has Canadian society become much mor

浏览: 日期:2020-06-10

论文题目:Has Canadian society become much more like American society as result of the charter of rights and freedom?
论文语种:英文
您的研究方向:政治
是否有数据处理要求:否
您的国家:加拿大
您的学校背景:
要求字数:800
论文用途:本科课程论文
是否需要盲审(博士或硕士生有这个需要):否
补充要求和说明:
1.Introduction
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is an important part of Constitution Act of 1982. It provides various civil rights which the government protects but rights are not absolutized. On the one hand, personal rights of citizen are very concerned; on the other hand, group rights of minority are taken into serious consideration. The charter is applied to improve the status of judicial organ, help carry out the policy of multi-culture, protect the rights od minority and have an important effect on constitutional system. The Charter reflects spirit of rule of law fully and help to prevent the government officials from abusing power to violate the civil rights. It has an important historical meaning in Canadian constitutional system.
 
2. Impact on the revision and perfection of criminal law
During the 30 years since the Charter of 1982 promulgated, most cases involved in  the rights of charter have been related to the criminal law.
In criminal law, the court sets rules to national agents directly. For example, when deal with the charge of defendant, the defendant will be free if the police got evidences under such circumstances that police violated the rights of charter. Therefore, by affecting the hearing case, the verdict of Supreme Judicial Court can be executed in criminal law than that in others and can deny governmental articles of law directly. In a word, the court need three kinds od audits to protect the civil rights. First, examine and verify the justice of laws that are authorized to the government officials. Second, examine and verify the rationality of the compulsive behaviors of officials. Last, examine and verify appropriateness of the procedures of enforcing the laws. According to the three ways, the Supreme Judicial Court requires that sufficient reason should be provided when depriving the civil rights in order not to lead to wrongful harm. So the Congress will be more careful and responsible to make laws and perfect related laws constantly.
 
3. Impact on the promotion of multicultural policy under two official languages
In 1971, the federal government determined the multicultural policy: admit all the citizens are the equal participants of Canadian society; the federalism guarantees different races for its own cultural tradition in unitive social structure and normal relationship and communication among different nations. The policy confirms the cultural situation of multi-population and creates a new Canadian culture by strengthening the friendly relationship among races so as to form a sense of belonging and responsibility in common for the while country, which surpasses the consciousness of any nation.
The promotion of the Charter to carry out the multicultural policy under two official languages performs highlighted: first, language and educational rights for minority ethnic groups; second, problems of religionary freedom when closed on Sunday. But some troubles happened when the policy was carried out even if the verdict of court was executed to examine the destination of laws instead of considering the actual effect. Therefore, many Canadian scholars pointed out that between the traditional pursuit for commonplace principles of equality and the policy of acknowledging the uniqueness of minority ethnic groups since 30 years, a rational balance can help guarantee that everyone can live peacefully and easily in society.
 
4. Impact on admitting and protection to the rights of homosexuals
Like many western countries, after Second World War homosexuals appeared in Canada but their rights were not admitted in a long run. Upon the issue of homosexuals, the judges paly an important role in the decisions and promote the development of related public policy. The clause of equality in the Charter did not involve in homosexuals however judges covered them by the mean of deduction. In fact, the Article 15th was open when the Federal parliamentary committee discussed the Charter during 1980 to 1981. When being questioned whether the range of the Article included homosexuals or not, the Minister of Justice letted the court make decisions for the maker of the Charter wanted the court to include the similar scope. In 2005, the Federal government of Liberal Party promulgated the law to legalize the same-sex marriage. At the same time, the verdict of the court provided the base of the legal relations for homosexuals.
 
5. Impact on the constitutional system
As for the verdict of court to the case about civil rights, the Congress need to do some adjustment for related laws. Therefore, in civil rights of the Charter, judicial department has participated in the lawmaking indirectly, which means the Charter has had an important influence on the Canadian political institution. For an early example, in 1982 Ontario Image Appreciation Association sued the film censorship of the province for its violation of the Charter. However, the Ontario Court thought that although it was rational to limit the freedom of expression, the standard of using need laws to describe at least. And the verdict got the support of the court. Soon afterward, the Ontario Congress promulgated related laws.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982 has had an lasting effect on the Canadian society. Canadians will benefit from the great Charter.
论文题目:加拿大社会变得更加像美国社会权利和自由宪章的结果吗?
论文语种:英文
您的研究方向:政治
是否有数据处理要求:否
您的国家:加拿大
您的学校背景:
要求字数:800
论文用途:本科课程论文
是否需要盲审(博士或硕士生有这个需要):否
补充要求和说明:
绪论
加拿大权利和自由宪章“是1982年宪法法案的重要组成部分。它提供的各种公民权利的政府保护,但权利不绝对化。一方面,公民的人身权利都非常关注,另一方面,认真考虑少数群体的权利。宪章的应用,提高司法机关的地位,有利于开展多元文化政策,保护他们的权利OD少数民族和宪政体制上有重要影响。宪章反映充分法律的规定精神,并有助于防止政府官员滥用权力侵犯公民权利。加拿大宪法制度中具有重要的历史意义。
 
2。关于修订和完善刑法的影响
宪章“,1982年颁布以来的30多年里,大多数情况下,参与包机的权利已涉及到刑事法律。
在刑法中,法院直接设置规则全国代理商。例如,当被告负责处理,被告将是免费的,如果警方有证据,在这种情况下,警察侵犯的权利宪章。因此,影响听力的情况下,最高司法法院的判决可以在刑法执行比别人直接也不能否认政府的法条。总之,法院需要3种外径审核,以保护公民权利。首先,检查和验证的正义法律授权的政府官员。二,审查和核实官员的强迫行为的合理性。最后,检查和验证的程序执行法律的恰当性。最高司法法院需要根据三种方式,剥夺公民权利时,应提供足够的理由,为了不导致不当的伤害。因此,美国国会可能会更加谨慎,负责制定法律,不断完善相关法律。
 
3。促进多元文化政策的影响下两种官方语言
在1971年,联邦政府确定的多元文化政策:承认所有公民都平等参与加拿大社会不同种族的联邦制保证自身的文化传统,在统一的社会结构和不同国家之间的正常关系及沟通。政策确认多人口的文化状况,加强种族之间的友好关系,从而形成共同的归属感和责任感,而国家,超过任何一个国家的意识,并创建一个新的加拿大文化。
促进开展两种官方语言的多元文化政策下执行“宪章”强调:第一,语言和少数民族的教育权利;第二,问题自由religionary时周日休息。但发生了一些麻烦策略时,即使法院的判决进行执行,检查目标的法律,而不考虑实际效果。因此,不少加拿大学者指出,传统追求为司空见惯的原则平等,承认少数民族的独特性,因为30年的政策,之间一个合理的平衡,可以帮助保证每个人都可以和平地生活在社会。
 
4。承认和保护同性恋者的权利的影响
许多西方国家一样,出现第二次世界大战后同性恋者在加拿大,但他们的权利没有得到承认,从长远来看。同性恋者的问题时,法官发青的一个重要的决定作用,并促进相关公共政策的发展。在“宪章”中的平等条款并不涉及同性恋者,但法官涵盖他们的平均值扣除。事实上,文章15日被打开时,联邦议会委员会讨论“宪章”在1980年至1981年。当被质疑的文章的范围是否包括同性恋者或没有,司法部长letted法院“宪章”的厂商作出决定希望法院范围包括类似。在2005年,联邦自由党政府颁布了“同性婚姻合法化的法律。与此同时,法院的判决提供了对同性恋者的法律关系的基础。
 
5。宪政体制的影响
至于法院的判决有关公民权利的情况下,国会需要做的一些相关法律法规的调整。因此,在“宪章”的民事权利,司法部门曾参与间接地在立法,这意味着“宪章”在加拿大的政治制度已经产生了重要影响。对于一个早期的例子,在1982年Ontario图片赏析协会状告全省违反“宪章”的电影审查制度。然而,安大略省法院认为,虽然这是合理的限制言论自由,使用的标准,至少需要法律来形容。判决得到了法院的支持。此后不久,安大略省国会颁布了相关法律法规。
加拿大权利和自由宪章“于1982年在加拿大社会有持久的影响。加拿大人将受益于“大宪章”。