essay代写,代写assignment,paper代写,代写留学作业,英国作业

导航切换

QQ:
153688106

二维码

加拿大代写留学生作业|自由贸易与环境福利的

浏览: 日期:2020-06-10

Coexistence and environmental welfare deficit trade surplus 
Trade promotes economic development through trade growth after joining the WTO led China's economic growth. December 11, 2001 China officially became a WTO member country, after China's trade growth is very rapid. This change from the following figures available evidence: in 2001 exports totaled 2.20244 trillion yuan, in 2002 was 2.69479 trillion yuan in 2010, is 10.09875 trillion yuan. Compared with 2001, ten years is a 359 percent growth rate, average annual growth rate reached 18.4%. Total imports side, 2001 was 2.01592 trillion yuan, in 2002 was 2.44304 trillion yuan, in 2010 was 8.92691 trillion yuan, the total growth rate was 343%, compared with 2001, the average increase is 18%. Import and export trade to economic growth (in GDP index as a reference value) contribution rate is maintained at a high of nearly a quarter, or about 9% of the average GDP growth rate of 25% was driven by the export trade The. 2001 import and export contribution rate was 15 percent and 13 percent, from 2002 to 2010, the average import and export contribution rates were 26% and 28%, of which 2003 the highest value reached 60% or more.
 
At the same time, Chinese people enjoy in reducing the environmental benefits. Environmental benefits are in addition to basic human survival conditions are met under the premise of seeking fresh air and clean water and other environmental rights needs, and to ensure intergenerational equity and sustainable environmental rights. Statistics found that, after joining the WTO significant increase in China's energy consumption and pollution emissions is also expanding, our country does not already exist mild carbon emissions provinces. Compared with the U.S., with the world's leading economies, bilateral trade because of differences in complementary leaving China maintained a trade surplus of more than ten years, at the same time, China is also accused of being the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases. The study data show that from 1994 to 2001 the connotation of polluted conditions index grew steadily, peaking in 2001, followed by a smaller trend. China joined the WTO in imports from the United States included the amount of pollution increases, the amount of pollution reduced exports included. United States, by contrast, with the expansion of trade liberalization and international trade division of labor adjustment mode, the United States due to his country's imports of goods and services for the benefit of their people, to meet their development needs a large number of manufacturing plants transferred to other countries, will also be large part of the carbon emissions shifted to other countries. On the contrary, China has become a "world factory", and with the trade surplus expanded to undertake a large number of people in other countries to meet the needs of carbon emissions.
 
 
Balancing the interests of trade and environment Economic Explanation
 
The relationship between trade and economic growth theory has always been the focus of debate, environmental aspects into which the contradictions become more intense. People are always difficult to balance the crux of the long-term and short-term interests, stage of economic growth and sustainable environmental benefit, enjoyment and environmental benefits of people's material between.
 
First, the stage of economic prosperity need to be vigilant pollution spread. Environmental Kuznets theory that economic growth and environmental pollution inverted U-shaped relationship between, only when the economy develops to a certain stage (generally considered America's per capita GDP reached $ 10,000, or some other country's per capita GDP reached $ 6,000 time), pollution, possible improvements. However, energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions long-term trends are not consistent with the Kuznets curve, ie normal energy consumption of exhaustible resources are scarce, as human carbon dioxide emissions while increasing living standards improve, this can sometimes lead to rigidity the environment can not be repaired, or more than the threshold of the environment resulting ecosystem collapse, resulting in environmental capacity dropped significantly. China's current economic development level is still not reached Kuznets turning point, at this stage if the blind pursuit of environmental objectives while ignoring China's economic development is not consistent with real-world needs.
 
Secondly, the international trade environment, the total effect of damage. International trade to bring economic development, concomitant environmental effects has not given number. The environmental effects of trade is broken down into structural effects, technical effects and economies of scale in three aspects. Structure effect is based on the theory of comparative advantage specializes in the production and export of their products have a comparative advantage, comparative disadvantage imports of other products, making the country's output structure changes. Technical effect is mainly because consumers prefer green products and cleaning up the environment resulting from spills of environmentally sound technologies, production units of the total social product reduces environmental pollution, generally positive effect. Scale trade bring economic growth generated by changes in pollutant emissions, in general, how much economic growth, emissions will be a corresponding increase in the number. China empirical data show that comparative advantage is concentrated in a relatively clean, labor-intensive industries, comparative disadvantage more concentrated in capital-intensive pollution, land-intensive and energy-intensive industries, import and export trade growth and the structural trade surpluses are negative effects and economies of scale, and far more than the positive impact of technology-induced change, and thus, at this stage of the environmental effects of trade surplus is negative, ie increased environmental pollution, environmental damage to the total effect.
 
Third, import and export products structural contradictions caused environmental degradation. Study confirmed the data, China imported products are mainly concentrated in the petroleum processing industry, mining industry, chemical industry and other carbon-intensive industries, the export of products and more from the wholesale and retail trade, clothing, electronic equipment manufacturing, etc. low-carbon emission industries. Comparing import and export of complete carbon intensity, exports to other countries is much less than the imported pollution bring domestic pollution, and with the trade surplus continued to expand import and export structure will inevitably exacerbate the effects of negative environmental impact. Based on current export pattern, exports are not the main cause of environmental pollution, on the contrary, is the growth in imports led to the domestic environmental pollution spread.
 
Fourth, the cross-border pollution makes China become a "foreign garbage" paradise. Trade liberalization makes pollution flows from developed to developing countries, developing countries with lower environmental standards, pollution-intensive products has become a refuge. Those with higher environmental standards in developed countries, on the one hand in order to meet the domestic business community get votes to support the government would prefer to perform a lower environmental standards, resulting in the world as a whole rather than on the low environmental standards will be high; On the other hand, in order to curry favor with the radical environmentalists, they frequently denounce the low standards in developing countries to bring a lower level of average environmental benefits, require relatively uniform environmental standards and fair competitive environment. For the optimal level of global environmental benefits considered the world are looking to solve transboundary pollution internalization pathway. Cooperative game theory-based inter-state cooperation plan requires concerted action within the body member states transfer of emissions or pollution must take concerted action to reduce costs, through international financial transfers or bilateral tariff reduction to share domestic abatement costs. However, the uneven distribution of income under the conditions of international cooperation
加入WTO后通过贸易增长带动了中国的经济增长。2001年12月11日中国正式成为了世界贸易组织的一个成员国,此后中国的贸易增长是十分迅速的。这从如下的数字变化中可得到佐证:2001年的出口总额是22024.4亿元,2002年是26947.9亿元,2010年是100987.5亿元。与2001年相比,十年间的增长幅度是359%,平均年增幅达到了18.4%。进口总额方面,2001年是20159.2亿元,2002年是24430.4亿元,2010年是89269.1亿元,总的增长幅度是343%,较2001年平均增幅也是18%。
与此同时,中国人享受的环境福利在减少。环境福利是人类除了基本生存条件满足的前提下追求清新空气和洁净水源等环境权的需要,且要保证代际环境权的公平与可持续。统计发现,加入WTO后中国的能源消耗大增,污染排放也在不断扩大,目前我国已经不存在轻度碳排放的省区。与美国相比,同是世界上首屈一指的经济体,中美双边贸易因为差异互补而使中国保持了十余年来的贸易顺差,同时,中国也被指为世界最大的温室气体排放国。有关研究数据显示,1994-2001年的内涵污染条件指标平稳增长,2001年达到顶峰,随后有变小的趋势。中国在加入WTO后从美国获得的进口内含污染量增大,出口内含污染量减小。
利益平衡的贸易与环境经济学解释
 
贸易和经济增长之间的关系理论一直辩论到其中的矛盾更加激烈,环境方面的重点。人们总是难以平衡的长期利益和短期利益的关键阶段,经济增长和可持续发展的环境效益,享受和人民群众的物质之间的环境效益。
 
首先,经济繁荣的阶段,需要警惕污染蔓延。环境库兹涅茨理论,经济增长和环境污染的倒U形关系之间,只有当经济发展到一个阶段,一定(一般考虑美国的每人均国内生产总值达到万美元,或一些其他国家的每人均国内生产总值达到6000美元时间),污染可能改进。然而,能源消耗和二氧化碳排放的长期趋势是不符合库兹涅茨曲线,即正常的能源消耗枯竭的资源是稀缺的,作为人类的二氧化碳排放量,同时提高人民生活水平不断提高,这有时会导致环境的刚性无法修复,或超过环境的门槛导致生态系统崩溃,导致环境容量下降明显。中国目前的经济发展水平还没有达到库兹涅茨转折点,在这个阶段,如果一味追求环境目标,而忽略了中国的经济发展是不符合真实世界的需求。
 
其次,国际贸易环境,总的伤害效果。国际贸易带来经济的发展,伴随而来的环境效应还没有定数。贸易对环境的影响被细分为三个方面的结构效应,技术效应和规模经济。结构效果比较优势理论的基础上,专门在其产品的生产和出口具有比较优势,其他产品的进口比较劣势,使得该国产量结构变化。技术效果,主要是因为消费者喜欢的绿色环保产品,并清理泄漏对环境造成的环境无害化技术,生产单位的社会总产品减少了对环境的污染,普遍积极的影响。带来经济增长所产生的污染物排放量的变化,一般贸易规模,经济增长多少,排放量将相应增加的数量。实证数据表明,中国的比较优势集中在一个相对干净的,劳动密集型产业,资本密集型的​​污染,土地密集型和能源密集型产业,进口和出口贸易的增长多集中在比较劣势和结构性贸易盈余为负的效应和经济规模,远远超过技术引起的变化的积极影响,因此,在这个阶段对环境的影响,贸易顺差为负,即增加了对环境的污染,环境破坏的总的效果。
 
三,进口和出口产品的结构性矛盾造成的环境退化。研究证实的数据,中国进口的产品主要集中在石油加工行业,采矿业,化学工业和其他碳密集型产业,出口的产品和更从批发和零售贸易,服装,电子设备制造等低碳排放产业。比较完整的碳排放强度的进口和出口,出口到其他国家远远小于进口的污染,使国内的污染,并与贸易顺差继续扩大进口和出口结构的影响将不可避免地加剧对环境的负面影响。基于目前的出口模式,出口没有环境污染的主要原因,相反,进口的增长导致国内环境污染蔓延。
 
四,跨界污染,使中国成为一个“洋垃圾”的天堂。贸易自由化使污染从发达国家向发展中国家流动,发展中国家的环境标准较低,污染密集型​​产品已经成为避难所。那些在发达国家更高的环境标准,一方面是为了满足国内企业界得到的票数支持政府宁愿执行环境标准较低,造成在世界上作为一个整体,而不是在低环境标准会很高,另一方面,为了讨好与激进的环保主义者,他们经常谴责在发展中国家的低标准带来一个较低的水平,平均环境效益,需要相对统一的环境标准和公平的竞争环境。考虑全球环境效益的最佳水平,世界各国都在寻找解决跨界污染的内在途径。合作博弈理论为基础的国家间的合作计划,要求体成员国转让的排放或污染的内采取协调一致的行动必须采取协调一致的行动,以降低成本,通过国际金融转账或双边关税减让分享国内减排成本。