Politics and policy in Brad Wall’s Saskatchewan concerns about the reasons why Brad Wall was so successful and the possible policy challenges the next premier of Saskatchewan would face. The paper is well organized. In the first part, the author gives a introduction to Brad Wall’s success. Then factors leading to his political success are listed. At the last part, the author gives a partial list of the possible policy challenges the next premier of Saskatchewan would face. But the paper is not well written enough which will be mentioned later in this essay.
Brad Wall was entitled as premier of Saskatchewan since November 2007. 63 percent of the Saskatchewan respondents approved of the premier’s handling of the province’s business in a Vision Critical & Angus Reid online poll in 2011. Wall’s Saskatchewan Party had a 37-point lead over the provincial NDP and it seemed it’s very reassuring numbers for
Wall and his party to win the provincial election in November, 2011.
According to the author, although it would be easy to cite Lingenfelter’s apparent lack of charisma to explain Wall’s political success, there are other factors lead to Wall’s success. The first factor is the current strength of Saskatchewan’s economy. the province’s economic and fiscal situation is favorable at the moment. In the paper, the author cited that in June 2011 the unemployment rate in Saskatchewan was the lowest in the country, at a mere 4.9 percent. Moreover, he cited that the province’s public finances remain favorable compared to those in other provinces to support his view. However, for this point, what the author cited is not enough to prove the premier Brad Wall’s political success. the unemployment rate in Saskatchewan was the lowest in the country and public finances remain favorable compared to those in other provinces is the success of the Saskatchewan, not the success of Brad Wall. If the author wanted to prove the success of Brad Wall, materials about the situation of the province when it was taken over by other premier should be included.
Also, what his opponents raised that Wall benefited from the work that was done by the NPD during its years in office maybe possible right. The author argued that it would be unfair to reduce his political success to these two factors although Wall inherited sound public finances from the NDP era while benefiting from comparatively favorable economic conditions. this may not refute opponents’ view. It is just not enough and even may be contradictory with what was said before. Further more, Wall did well in the comprehensive tax-cut agenda a in a way that the provincial NDP could not argue with may not fully explain Wall’s great success.
But the way he handled the Potash Corp proved Wall truly successful. According to the author, The Saskatchewan premier is a shrewd politician who has typically avoided bold ideological gestures to adopt a seemingly moderate, center right agenda that seems largely in tune with the majority of the electorate on most issues. The author used the example of the way he handled the Potash Corp. File to explain Wall’s centrist approach. Wall’s decision to push the Harper government to block the sale of Potash Corp. to “foreign interests” was a political master-stroke that increased the premier’s national profile and strengthened his position in the province. And this had generally silenced the NDP opposition.
In the mid part of the paper, the author seemed have deviated from the theme. The author cared about the his chances of reelection and though it would remain high because its the political culture and historically, Saskatchewan voters have been patient with first-term governments, seeking stability rather than frequent political reversals. In another part, the NDP has a lot to do to rebuild itself, to find a younger and more charismatic leader, to distinguish itself from the Saskatchewan Party while staying relatively close to the political center. the NDP cannot count on outside economic forces to find its way back to power or, at least, electoral competitive-ness. Moreover, the NDP can hardly make a case that it is in a better position than the Saskatchewan Party to create a strong economy while making sure that all of the province’s 1 million inhabitants benefit from current growth. For the author, Brad Wall would definitely win another election. However, these all seems have nothing to do with Wall’s success.
In the last part is the major policy challenges faced by the next Saskatchewan government formed after the November 7 election. The author concerns about partial challenges, such as poverty issues, health care issues, environmental issues and massive investment . First, poverty remains a key issue although unemployment is comparatively low in Saskatchewan. According to the author, a key challenge for all levels of government is to work together in order to improve the educational opportunities and the living conditions of Aboriginal peoples in Saskatchewan. Second, controlling health care spending while improving access to care is also a challenge for Saskatchewan.
Also, environmental issues is a major substantive and public relations challenge for the province. To explain this, the author gives an example of a widely debated issue of electricity supply.Premier Wall did during his first mandate, would be well-advised to accelerate the talks with Manitoba over the possibility of buying hydro power from that province. This would be the best way to reduce Saskatchewan’s heavy reliance on coal while responding to its growing electricity needs. However, the choice of buying hydro power is a policy of electricity supply, and it may not take the environment into consideration.
Besides that, massive investments in infrastructure are needed because Saskatchewan’s population is now growing fast (by more than 1.5 percent last year) according to the author. But the author don’t give a full vision of the problem or that the reason is out of his expectation. He said that the government should invest more to build more rental properties in Saskatoon and Regina, a city that has now the low-est vacancy rate in Canada. But the aim to do this to attract more immigrants as well as workers from other provinces in order to avoid labor short-ages in key industries. None of this has anything to do with the Saskatchewan’s fast growing population.
In the last paragraph, conclusions the author made is contradictory.in the beginning of the paragraph, the author thought that this partial list of challenges might not be a problem for Brad Wall, who has shown more pragmatism than some had anticipated in his role of premier. However, the author doubted whether he would he be able to address these challenges if he was re-elected on November 7.
If I were the author, paragraphs concerting Brad Wall’s chances of reelection in the middle would be deleted. Also, I would give more detail about what Brad Wall do differently and the province’s situation of his previous premiers to prove his political success.
Reference
Alan Bryman. (1987). Social Research Methods.Oxford University Press.
Basic Paper Organization. <http://depts.washington.edu/pswrite/organize.html>.
Daniel Béland. (2011). Politics and policy in Brad Wall’s Saskatchewan. Policy Options.
Curb Paper Clutter at Home. <http://www.womansday.com/home/organizing/curb-paper-clutter-at-home-119208.>
Basic Paper Organization
布拉德·沃尔的萨斯喀彻温省担心布拉德·沃尔的原因是如此的成功，可能出现的政策挑战，萨斯喀彻温省将面临下一任总理的政治和政策。纸张良好的组织。在第一部分中，笔者给出了一个介绍布拉德·沃尔的成功。然后，他的政治上的成功因素导致上市。在最后一部分，作者给出了可能出现的政策的部分列表萨斯喀彻温省将面临挑战下一任总理。但纸不能很好地写得够多了，在这篇文章中，这在后面会提到。
萨斯喀彻温总理自2007年11月被认定为布拉德·沃尔。 63％的萨斯喀彻温省的受访者赞成总理的视野中的关键安格斯里德在线调查显示，2011年全省业务处理。沃尔的萨斯喀彻温省NDP党有37分的领先优势，似乎这是非常令人欣慰的数字
沃尔和他的党赢得2011年11月省级选举。
据笔者，虽然它会很容易引用林根费尔特的解释明显缺乏魅力长城的政治上的成功，也有其他因素导致长城的成功。第一个因素是萨斯喀彻温省的经济目前的实力。全省经济和财政形势是有利的时刻。在论文中，作者援引2011年6月，在萨斯喀彻温省的失业率是全国最低的，仅为4.9％。此外，他提到，全省公共财政仍然逊于那些在其他省份来支持他的观点。然而，对于这一点，笔者引用的是没有足够的证明首屈一指的布拉德·沃尔的政治成功。在萨斯喀彻温省的失业率是全国最低的，那些在其他省份相比，公共财政状况保持良好，是萨斯喀彻温省，而不是成功的布拉德·沃尔的成功。如果作者想证明成功的布拉德·沃尔，全省的情况时，它被接管其他总理的材料应包括在内。
此外，什么墙受益而进行的工作由NPD在其多年在办公室也许可能有权提出他的对手。笔者认为，这是不公平，以减少他的政治上的成功，这两个因素，虽然长城继承健全的公共财政从NDP时代，而受益于相对良好的经济条件。这可能不会反驳对手的观点。这仅仅是不够的，甚至可能是相互矛盾的，之前说了什么。此外，“华尔街以及在全面减税议程中，省NDP无法反驳的方式，可能不能完全解释长城的伟大成功。
但处理的方式，他钾肥公司证明了长城真正的成功。据笔者，萨斯喀彻温总理是一个精明的政治家通常避免采用大胆的思想手势一个看似温和的，中间偏右的议程与广大选民在大多数问题上，似乎在很大程度上调。笔者运用钾肥公司文件处理的方式，他解释长城的中间派的方法的例子。墙推哈珀政府阻止Potash公司出售的“外国利益”的决定是一个政治主冲程增加总理的国家形象和加强自己在全省的地位。而这通常沉默的NDP反对。
在中间部分的纸张，笔者似乎已经偏离了主题。笔者关心他蝉联的机会，虽然它会保持高位，因为它的政治文化和历史，萨斯喀彻温省的选民一直病人与第一届政府，寻求稳定，而不是频繁的政治逆转。在另一部分中，新民主党有很多事情要做重建自己，找到一个更年轻，更加有魅力的领导者，从萨斯喀彻温省党脱颖而出，同时保持相对接近的政治中心。新民主党不能依靠外部经济力量找到自己的方式回力，或者至少，选举的竞争性。此外，新民主党可以萨斯喀彻温省党比一个更好的位置，建立一个强大的经济，同时确保的情况下，它是很难使全省100万居民受益，从目前的增长。对于笔者来说，布拉德·沃尔肯定会赢得另一次选举。然而，这一切似乎什么都没有做墙的成功。
在最后一部分是萨斯喀彻温省在未来11月7日大选后形成的政府所面临的主要政策挑战。笔者关注的部分挑战，如贫困问题，医疗保健问题，环境问题和大规模投资。首先，贫困仍然是一个关键的问题，虽然在萨斯喀彻温省的失业率相对较低。据笔者，各级政府面临的主要挑战是共同努力，以改善受教育的机会，在萨斯喀彻温省的原住民的生活条件。其次，控制医疗保健支出，同时提高护理也是萨斯喀彻温省的一个挑战。
此外，环境问题是一个重大的实质性和公共关系，为全省的挑战。要解释这一点，笔者给出一个例子，做一个广泛争议的问题，电力supply.Premier墙，在他的第一个任务，将建议与马尼托巴省加快谈判的可能性从该省购买水电。这将是最好的方式，以减少萨斯喀彻温省对煤炭的严重依赖，同时应对其不断增长的电力需求。然而，选择购买水电是电力供应的政策，它可能不会考虑采取环境。
此外，需要大量投资于基础设施，因为萨斯喀彻温省的人口快速增长（超过1.5％去年）根据笔者。但笔者不给满怀憧憬的问题，原因是他的意料。他说，政府应该投入更多的建立在萨斯卡通和里贾纳，现在的低空置率在加拿大的一个城市，有更多的出租物业。但目的这样做是为了吸引更多的移民，以及来自其他省份的工人在为了避免劳动年龄，重点行业。有没有什么做与萨斯喀彻温省的人口快速增长。
在最后一段，结论笔者提出contradictory.in段落开头，笔者认为，这部分的挑战列表布拉德·沃尔，谁更务实比一些人预计他的作用可能不是一个问题总理。然而，笔者怀疑他是否会他能来应对这些挑战，如果他再次当选11月7日。
如果我是作者，concerting布拉德·沃尔蝉联的机会，在中间的段落将被删除。另外，我想给更多的细节布拉德·沃尔做什么不同，他以前总理全省的情况，以证明他的政治上的成功。
参考
阿兰·布里曼。 （1987）。社会研究Methods.Oxford大学出版社。
基本纸张组织。 <http://depts.washington.edu/pswrite/organize.html>。
丹尼尔·贝兰德。 （2011年）。布拉德·沃尔的萨斯喀彻温省的政治和政策。政策选择。
遏制纸杂波在家。 <http://www.womansday.com/home/organizing/curb-paper-clutter-at-home-119208.>
基本纸张组织
